Skip to content

One word, several meanings

These are the terms the paper singles out as genuinely ambiguous. Each collapses techniques with different profiles.

Section 4.4

"We fine-tuned the model"

Whether every weight changed, only later layers, or none at all — three different scopes, three different validation burdens.

Ask: How much of the model was actually updated?

  • FT (full) — Continues training every weight in the model on new task data — maximum flexibility, maximum cost, and no part of the model left unchanged.
  • FT (partial) — Retrains only the later layers and freezes the early ones, so the general features learned during pre-training stay intact and less needs re-testing.
  • PEFT (LoRA, adapters) — Freezes the base model and trains a small add-on instead, so the original weights are never touched and the adapter can be swapped out or removed cleanly.

Compare these profiles →

Appendix C, Knowledge Transfer and Task Specialization

"We used few-shot learning"

FSL produces a new versioned model artifact requiring change control. ICL produces no artifact at all — the effect lasts one request.

Ask: Was a weight update performed?

  • FSL — Learns a new task from a handful of labelled examples by actually updating weights — as opposed to just showing examples in the prompt, which is ICL.
  • ICL — Shows the model a few worked examples in the prompt, adapting it for that request only, with no training and no artifact left behind.

Compare these profiles →

Section 4.4

"We use RAG"

The corpus, the retrieval method, and the update cadence. A maintained corpus is version-persistent even when each request's context is ephemeral.

Ask: Is the retrieval artifact maintained and versioned?

  • RAG — Retrieves relevant documents at query time and puts them in the context, so the model can use knowledge it was never trained on.
  • CE — Manages everything that goes into the model's context — retrieved documents, tools, history — as a maintained, versioned production asset.
  • ICL — Shows the model a few worked examples in the prompt, adapting it for that request only, with no training and no artifact left behind.

Compare these profiles →

Section 4.4, Appendix C

"We did domain adaptation"

At the LLM tier the classical mechanism is superseded by continued pre-training or domain-specific PEFT. The label hides which was actually used.

Ask: Which model tier?

  • DA — Trains a model to close the gap when the data seen at deployment looks different from the training data, without needing many labels for the new domain.
  • SSL / CPT — Continues pre-training on unlabelled data from a specialist domain, so the model absorbs its patterns and vocabulary before any task-specific tuning.
  • PEFT (LoRA, adapters) — Freezes the base model and trains a small add-on instead, so the original weights are never touched and the adapter can be swapped out or removed cleanly.

Compare these profiles →

Appendix C, Training Strategies

"The model learns to learn"

At the LLM tier, in-context learning achieves rapid task adaptation without the bi-level training loop meta-learning implies.

Ask: Which model tier?

  • Meta-Learning — Trains a model to be good at learning new tasks quickly, rather than good at any one task — "learning to learn".
  • ICL — Shows the model a few worked examples in the prompt, adapting it for that request only, with no training and no artifact left behind.

Compare these profiles →

Section 2

"The model was retrained"

Retraining and full fine-tuning are mechanistically identical. Only the goal and the data separate them — restoring lost performance is not the same as targeting a new task.

Ask: Why was it changed?

  • Retraining — Trains the existing model again on newer data to recover accuracy lost as the world drifted away from the original training distribution.
  • FT (full) — Continues training every weight in the model on new task data — maximum flexibility, maximum cost, and no part of the model left unchanged.

Compare these profiles →