Skip to content

Data-Centric and Privacy-Preserving Methods

FL

In brief — site editorial, not from the paper

Trains across many devices or institutions without centralising their data — each site computes updates locally and only those are shared.

Definition

FL trains a global model by aggregating gradient updates from local models on decentralized datasets, ensuring raw training data never leaves local devices [103, 137]. Its Parametric Update classification reflects that FL does execute GD and produce formal weight modifications—distinguishing it from pipeline-mediated data strategies—but the critical structural differentiator is Decentralized: no centralized training corpus exists. Each client computes gradients locally on its private data shard and transmits only model updates (weight deltas or gradients) to the server for aggregation; raw data never leaves the originating device. This decentralized data geometry is what justifies Privacy Preservation as a D2 (Goal): FL does not merely apply privacy as a constraint layered onto a task-training objective—privacy preservation is an intrinsic structural property of the data access pattern, not an add-on mechanism. The absence of centralized training data means that data-quality auditing, distributional characterization, and bias assessment must be delegated to client-local verification processes or statistical reporting protocols; the server cannot directly inspect the training corpus, making third-party data-provenance attestation mechanisms a system-engineering requirement rather than an optional audit supplement.

Verbatim from the paper — Data-Centric and Privacy-Preserving Methods

Nearest profiles

DP-FT (0.45), Calibration (0.58), Retraining (0.58), Training (0.58), FT (full) (0.62)

Computed from the taxonomy data (Gower distance over all six dimensions)

References

  1. [103] Peter Kairouz, and H. Brendan McMahan 2021. Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning
  2. [137] Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas 2017. Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics

Numbered as in the paper

Cite this row

FL — six-dimensional profile
D1: parametric-update
D2: privacy-preservation
D3: decentralized
D4: scheduled-permanent
D5: distributed
D6: dl, fm, llm, ml, mllm
Source: arXiv:2608.06246
Compare with another technique Find in the explorer